Law Tests

Morrison & Foerster Assessments

Ace your Morrison & Foerster application process with targeted practice tests.

Buy tests Free test

Careers at Morrison & Foerster

Morrison & Foerster stands as an international legal beacon, renowned for its comprehensive services in intellectual property, litigation, financial dealings, and regulatory guidance. The firm prides itself on fostering a diverse work environment and insists on a high level of pro bono commitment. Ambitious legal practitioners are drawn to Morrison & Foerster for its dedication to fostering talent and promoting professionalism. They recruit regularly to sustain their culture of excellence and intellectual rigor. Aspiring candidates vie for positions in this esteemed firm, which necessitates a meticulous and thorough hiring process designed to identify and select the most adept and culturally aligned individuals.

Morrison & Foerster Application Process

The selection process has 4 major stages:

1. Online Application

2. Online Assessment

3. Interview

4. Assessment Centre

Morrison & Foerster Online Application

The Online Application is the gateway to opportunities at Morrison & Foerster. It is meticulously designed to capture the essence of your professional background, skills, and personal attributes. Here, you will provide your resume, personal statements, and references. The firm uses this information to gauge your suitability for the legal sector and assess your alignment with their values such as dedication to pro bono work and a collaborative spirit.

Morrison & Foerster Online Assessment

Online Assessments serve as a critical filter in Morrison & Foerster's selection process. These assessments measure a range of abilities from analytical thinking to ethical judgment. Candidates should expect scenarios and problems that gauge not only intellectual capacity but also how they align with the firm's dedication to client service and diverse culture. Preparation is key, and Law Tests offers tailored practices to give candidates an edge.

Morrison & Foerster Interview

The Interview stage at Morrison & Foerster is a comprehensive assessment of a candidate’s fit within the firm's renowned culture and practices. A series of interviews with different members of the firm may discuss your work experience, problem-solving skills, and motivation for working at Morrison & Foerster. Effective communication and a deep understanding of your own capabilities and the firm’s values are vital at this juncture.

Morrison & Foerster Assessment Centre

The Assessment Centre is a multifaceted final step that immerses the candidate in a range of legal tasks and collaborative exercises reflective of daily life at Morrison & Foerster. Expect to tackle case studies, group discussions, and role-playing situations to demonstrate your ability to thrive in a dynamic and intellectually challenging work environment.

Sample Morrison & Foerster Assessments question Test your knowledge!

Score: /6

It has long been recognised that industry leads the way in furthering innovative engineering research.

Engineering research centers (ERCs) were first established in this country in the middle of the 1980s with the direct intention of fostering improved Research and Development collaboration between universities, industry, and the government. Unlike similar engineering research initiatives that preceded ERCs, they were introduced with a broad remit; their focus was on changing the conduct of academic engineering research and education as well as pre-competitive generic research. The key focus was on innovation in next-generation technology advances at the intersection of disciplines. It was recognized that universities were often the only places that had sufficient engineering knowledge to be able to deliver the level of research that was required to support such objectives. The results of the research were intended to be useful to the industry but with a longer-term view than other research. Another direct outcome of the ERCs was that university graduates would, in theory, be better prepared to commence work in an engineering environment.

As time went on the next generation of ERCs went one step further and encouraged collaboration across universities and had a direct focus on the younger generation of students with a leaning towards engineering - not just those who were already studying at the universities in question. The third generation of ERCs was implemented in 2008 and was created to cope with an increasingly global economy and also a reduction in student interest in sciences and engineering.

  • True
  • False
  • Cannot Tell

Being obliged to break confidentiality in a therapeutic relationship is always a direct result of the law.

Psychotherapists recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold client-therapist confidentiality. However, there are situations that may occur where the therapist is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the therapist is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the therapist is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client. However, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to acts of terrorism; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Individual employers and independent therapists have their own boundaries but must agree on this contractually with their clients at the outset of the therapeutic relationship.

  • True
  • False
  • Cannot Tell

When a client reports their involvement in an act of terrorism, their therapist is legally obliged to report this.

Psychotherapists recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold client-therapist confidentiality. However, there are situations that may occur where the therapist is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the therapist is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the therapist is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client. However, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to acts of terrorism; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Individual employers and independent therapists have their own boundaries but must agree on this contractually with their clients at the outset of the therapeutic relationship.

  • True
  • False
  • Cannot Tell

Therapists have some flexibility regarding what they deem serious enough to lead them to breach confidentiality.

Psychotherapists recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold client-therapist confidentiality. However, there are situations that may occur where the therapist is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the therapist is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the therapist is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client. However, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to acts of terrorism; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Individual employers and independent therapists have their own boundaries but must agree on this contractually with their clients at the outset of the therapeutic relationship.

  • True
  • False
  • Cannot Tell

Most therapists agree with the conditions the law places on them relating to breaching client confidentiality.

Psychotherapists recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold client-therapist confidentiality. However, there are situations that may occur where the therapist is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the therapist is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the therapist is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client. However, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to acts of terrorism; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Individual employers and independent therapists have their own boundaries but must agree on this contractually with their clients at the outset of the therapeutic relationship.

  • True
  • False
  • Cannot Tell

If a therapist breaches confidentiality about a serious issue without first informing their client of their intentions, they are breaking the law.

Psychotherapists recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold client-therapist confidentiality. However, there are situations that may occur where the therapist is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the therapist is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the therapist is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client. However, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to acts of terrorism; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Individual employers and independent therapists have their own boundaries but must agree on this contractually with their clients at the outset of the therapeutic relationship.

  • True
  • False
  • Cannot Tell

Build your confidence today

Try one of our Morrison & Foerster tests for FREE.

I’ve always found the service that Law Tests provides to be excellent throughout the whole interview process.

Caitlin used Law Tests to help him secure a position at Linklaters

testimonial

Morrison & Foerster Assessments Tips

Understand the Firm

Get acquainted with Morrison & Foerster's areas of practice and firm culture to tailor your test responses.

Analytical Sharpness

Polish your analytical and critical thinking skills to excel in problem-solving tasks.

Communication Clarity

Practice clear and effective communication for language proficiency assessments.

Free Practice on Law Tests

Utilize Law Tests for complimentary practice exams to prepare thoroughly.

Level up

Choose the package that works for you.

Pro

Pay Annually
Pay Monthly
  • 9 Aptitude packages
  • 20 Admissions packages
  • 52 Employer packages
  • 14 Publisher packages
  • Dashboard performance tracking
  • Full solutions and explanations
  • Tips, tricks, guides and resources

  • Access to free tests
  • Basic performance tracking
  • Full solutions and explanations
  • Tips and resources
Free

Morrison & Foerster Assessments FAQs

What are the Morrison & Foerster tests?

The Morrison & Foerster tests are part of their rigorous recruitment process designed to evaluate a candidate's compatibility with the firm's values, culture, and the intellectual demands of legal work.

Are the Morrison & Foerster tests hard?

Like many law firm assessments, Morrison & Foerster's tests are challenging but not insurmountable. They seek to identify candidates who are well-rounded, professionally prepared and align with the firm's ethos.

How do I prepare for Morrison & Foerster tests?

To prepare for Morrison & Foerster tests, consistent practice and familiarity with the format are key. Law Tests provides a variety of practice tests to help you feel confident and prepared.

How long does the recruitment process take at Morrison & Foerster?

The recruitment process at Morrison & Foerster varies by position and candidate, but can generally take several weeks to months, from application to final interviews and job offer.

What are Morrison & Foerster's core values?

Morrison & Foerster's core values include a deep commitment to client service, pro bono work, fostering a diverse culture, and promoting excellence and collaboration among their attorneys.